Art:religion, science, and philosophy.
Art does not
belong
in only one category. The same way science is an art, religion and a
philosophy; philosophy is an art, a science and a religion; and
religion is a
philosophy,
an art and science.
Everything I do, I do to get all four to
cohabitate. They can't be separated from each
other.
Of course
some
pieces will have one concept that might be more emphasized then the
others,
but there can really be no one without the other.
Not only that, but art is what you do with your hands.
No matter
what you
do, it can be art, as long as you do it with the respect that art,
religion,
science and philosophy deserve. The difference in between an artist
taking
out
the trash and the normal person taking out the trash is that the
artist
may put enough
care into how he takes the trash out so that it becomes
an art
in and of itself.
It is
important
however to be careful and not get too confused on the use I make of the
words
respect, art, religion, science and philosophy, especially when used
together. Art
does not require 5 genuflection before you site,
followed by
three prayers of how
E=MC^2 and how we think, therefor we are. However,
art
can be all of those at the
same time or separate, as long as the
respect is
there. And again, the word respect
needs to be understood, for art can
be
created with violence, lack of thought, and lack
of respect. But to
become
art as such, it needs the respect of the public, the viewer.
Of course
that
respect can also be disrespect when the artist is trying to create such
a
feeling in the viewer, and if successful, then his work can also
be
considered good art.
Art as a religion:
Art has it's
cathedrals, it's followers, and it's fanatics. Art is worshiped just
like the
gods and goddesses and has bibles, toras and Korans written
about
it.
I'll take
for the
example of a bible of art my art history reading book 'Art in Theory,
1900 -
1990, an Anthology of Changing Ideas' by Harrison & Wood. It is a
thick
book, of
1189 pages, that covers many different social, philosophical,
and
scientific concepts
that art can portray. Just like the Bible in
Christianism
does not say what religion is,
but instead gives concepts which, put
together, can be interpreted by it's reader as a
philosophy, a way of
life;
'Art in Theory' does not say what art has to be to be good art,
just
what it
can be to be good art.
My favorite
examples
of art cathedrals are to my opinion, but not limited to: MOMA,
San Francisco's Museum of Modern
Arts; Guggenheim
Museum, in New York;
Sagrada Familia cathedral, by Gaudi in Barcelona (this one in fact is
a
cathedral for
both art and religion and still is not completed). One
important thing to understand
when I refer to those places as art
cathedrals,
is that they are not such because of the
size of the buildings, but
because
of the worshiping of art that takes place in those
buildings. In fact
the
building itself can be the worshiped piece of art.
An art's pope would be to me Leonardo Da Vinci.
He represents through all of his work
the religion, science, and
philosophy
humanly imaginable. He pioneered on art in
techniques and engineering
in such
a matter that some of his designs were not decades
but in fact
centuries
ahead of his time. We recently discovered that he had designed a
self
powered
car, but not until recently did a team of Italian researchers manage to
decrypt the for-mentioned designs.
Art as a science:
Science is the application of a set of rules that can be proven according to observation and experimentation.
If my
concept of
'everything done with your hands is an art' holds true, then science is
no
exception. It follows it's own rules and philosophies, but is in no way
distinguishable
from art. Science can be, and if fact is, brought into
art
galleries and put up on walls.
Everything done in science, from the
Western
European science of medicine, to the
science of engineering sky
scrapers,
passing by the science of space travel, all of those
are forms of
art.
See my art on computer science as one example.
See my art on numerical science as one other example.
But art
follows it's
own set of rules, from how a specific medium is to be used, to how
it
will
play with it's viewers feelings and emotions. As such, art follows a
science
that
can be broken to create a new set of rules, but ironically that
new set
of rules will
still depend on the old set of rules, since the viewer
has to
have a basis to approache the
piece of art.
Art as a philosophy:
Philosophy
is an
extremely important aspect of art. If we did not live according to a
set
of
rules, we would have chaos. Art is the same way. It needs a set of
rules to
become
ordered, and those set of rules can be applied to every day
life.
·A Buddhist student went to his master
and
teacher and
asked:'Master, why do we spend
so
much
time learning how to paint, and learning good archery, and learning all
of
those
other skills that we really do not need, since we will all die
and none
of the skills I am
speaking about help us survive?'His master replied:'Because if we did not, how then
would we
appreciate
the sun rise and the sun set?'(free
memory
translation of an
excerpt of the book: 'Le doigt et la Lune' by
Alexandro
Jodorovsky.)
The point of
this
story, apart from the fact that it is an art piece in and of itself, is
that
if we do not learn appreciation of beauty through art, we can not
appreciate
the beauty
of our world. We then use art as a means to transcend
ourselves,
and to become one
with our surroundings. Art is then a way of living,
or also
known as a philosophy.
© 2005 Solomon Latham